In today’s hyper-digital world, customer support has quietly undergone a seismic shift. Once the domain of patient phone agents and in-person service desks, it is now ruled by bots, help centers, and automated menus. Companies like Safaricom, Facebook (Meta), and Twitter (X) are increasingly turning their backs on traditional human-based customer service—especially in emerging markets like Kenya and broader Sub-Saharan Africa.
While automation promises cost savings and efficiency, it raises a deeper question: What happens when systems go wrong—and there’s no one to talk to?
Why Are Companies Abandoning Human Support?
1. Cost Efficiency & Scalability
Human support is expensive. A call center agent needs training, salary, benefits, and infrastructure. In contrast, a chatbot costs a fraction to deploy and can operate 24/7 without breaks.
- According to IBM, businesses spend $1.3 trillion on 265 billion customer service calls each year—a major driver for AI automation.
- Safaricom, for example, has streamlined its support through Zuri, a WhatsApp chatbot, and MySafaricom App FAQs.
Read Also: Raised by Screens: How Digital Media Is Shaping Kenya’s Gen Alpha
2. Standardization at Scale
Big tech platforms like Facebook and X (Twitter) handle billions of users. Personalizing support for every complaint, ad account dispute, or suspension is logistically impossible without massive investment. Hence, they develop automated triage systems and community forums.
- Facebook/Meta has no regional office for most African countries. Users must report issues through AI-driven support menus that often loop indefinitely.
- Once flagged, you are essentially guilty until the algorithm says otherwise—with no recourse to argue your innocence.
3. Data-Driven Decision-Making
Automation also allows companies to collect and process data on user queries in real time, improving predictive analytics and reducing response times. Human agents, by comparison, are slower and often inconsistent in their responses.
The Problems No Bot Can Solve
Despite the cost advantages, there are many complex or sensitive issues that self-service portals fail to address:
- Account bans or algorithmic mistakes (e.g., flagged political posts, copyright errors, impersonation accusations)
- Billing or fraud complaints
- Mental health-sensitive content appeals
- Technical bugs that don’t fit a standard help category
For example, if your Facebook Ad account is disabled without clear reason, your appeal goes to an opaque AI review system, not a human panel. For African users especially, language barriers, lack of localization, and absence of physical offices make resolution even more difficult.
The Ethical Implications: Automation Without Accountability
1. Digital Injustice & Powerlessness
When systems are automated without local accountability, they create structural inequality. An African user banned from Twitter cannot speak to anyone. Meanwhile, users in the U.S. or Europe can sometimes escalate issues through PR channels or legal representation.
- This introduces a tiered digital citizenship, where one’s country determines the likelihood of digital justice.
2. Algorithmic Bias and No Right to Appeal
AI and moderation algorithms are not neutral. They are trained on datasets that may carry cultural bias, leading to unjust flagging of African languages, dialects, or imagery as “spam” or “suspicious.”
With no human to plead your case, you’re simply silenced.
3. Mental Toll and Frustration
Users dealing with banned business accounts, stolen funds, or privacy issues often report stress, helplessness, and fatigue. The cold wall of automation invalidates human emotion—and in many cases, commercial loss.
What Does This Mean for African Users and Governments?
Lack of Local Presence
Companies like Facebook, TikTok, and X don’t maintain physical complaint desks or data centers in most African countries. That means:
- No regulatory oversight on moderation practices
- No clear GDPR-style rights
- No consumer protection recourse through local authorities
Weak Legal Frameworks
While Kenya’s Data Protection Act offers a structure, enforcement against multinational tech companies is minimal. Users face a legal vacuum when they need accountability.
Are There Solutions?
1. Digital Consumer Protection Policies
African regulators must push for mandatory physical or legal representation in each country for tech giants operating at scale. Penalties should exist for platforms that ignore urgent user grievances.
2. Hybrid Support Models
Companies like Equity Bank have embraced hybrid models—automated systems supported by live agents for complex cases. Safaricom can do more here by scaling back Zuri’s limitations and providing escalations to trained humans.
3. Regional Tech Coalitions
African nations could form a continental digital ombudsman—a watchdog agency to receive and review digital grievances from platforms that do not have local offices.
The move toward automation and away from human customer support reflects a global business shift—but in Africa, the consequences are more severe. When digital media companies operate without local accountability, users are vulnerable to censorship, misjudgment, and exclusion.
While digital transformation is essential, so is digital dignity. For Kenya’s tech ecosystem to thrive, users must have the right not just to connect—but to be heard.
Read Also: Can CBK Challenge M‑Pesa? Inside Kenya’s New Fast Payment System
Never Miss a Story: Join Our Newsletter
