Sudan, a nation historically marred by internal strife, has been engulfed in yet another catastrophic conflict since April 2023. Fierce battles between the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) and the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF) have plunged the country into chaos, triggering widespread displacement, humanitarian disasters, and regional instability. The Sudan Conflict is deeply rooted in decades of political, economic, and ethnic tensions, with repercussions that extend far beyond Sudan’s borders. This article delves into the historical causes, immediate triggers, devastating humanitarian consequences, and broader global implications of the Sudan conflict, supported by verified data and analysis.
Historical and Structural Causes of the Sudan Conflict
Sudan’s turbulent history is a tapestry of colonial exploitation, authoritarian rule, and systemic marginalization. Under British colonial administration (1899–1956), the country was divided into two distinct regions: the predominantly Arab-Muslim north and the ethnically African, Christian-animist south. This administrative separation entrenched identity-based disparities, sowing seeds of division that persisted after Sudan gained independence in 1956. The post-independence era saw two prolonged civil wars (1955–1972 and 1983–2005) between the northern government and southern rebels, fueled by disputes over resources, religion, and political representation. These conflicts culminated in South Sudan’s secession in 2011, a landmark event that stripped Sudan of 75% of its oil reserves and exacerbated economic fragility. However, the rump state of Sudan remained fractured, with marginalized regions like Darfur, Blue Nile, and South Kordofan rebelling against Khartoum’s neglect and exploitation.
The rise of Omar al-Bashir’s authoritarian regime (1989–2019) further entrenched Sudan’s cycle of violence. Bashir relied on militias to suppress dissent, most notoriously the Janjaweed in Darfur. In the early 2000s, these Arab militias, backed by the state, conducted genocidal campaigns against non-Arab groups, killing an estimated 300,000 people and displacing 2.5 million. The Janjaweed later morphed into the RSF, a paramilitary force formally legitimized by Bashir in 2013 to consolidate his grip on power. Under the leadership of Commander Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo (“Hemedti”), the RSF evolved into a parallel military entity, amassing wealth through control of gold mines and smuggling networks.
The 2019 Sudanese Revolution, which ousted Bashir after months of mass protests, offered a fleeting hope for democratic transition. A fragile power-sharing government was established between civilians and the military, but tensions simmered. In October 2021, SAF leader General Abdel Fattah al-Burhan and Hemedti orchestrated a coup, dismantling the transitional administration and derailing Sudan’s democratic aspirations. Disagreements over integrating the RSF into the SAF and disputes over control of economic resources escalated into open warfare by April 2023.
Read Also: Comprehensive Analysis of the Israel-Palestine Conflict
Immediate Triggers and Key Actors of the Sudan Conflict
The current conflict is fundamentally a power struggle between two rival military factions: the SAF and the RSF. The SAF, Sudan’s official military institution, views itself as the guardian of the state, while the RSF, a wealthy paramilitary force, has resisted subordination. Central to the clash is the unresolved integration of the RSF into the SAF, a process stipulated in the 2019 transitional agreements but stalled due to the RSF’s reluctance to relinquish its financial autonomy. The RSF’s economic empire—built on gold mining, smuggling, and control of strategic infrastructure—generates billions annually, funding its military operations and political influence. Hemedti’s ambitions to secure a dominant role in Sudan’s governance directly challenge the SAF’s traditional authority, creating an irreconcilable rift.
Economic collapse and resource competition have further inflamed tensions. Sudan’s economy, crippled by decades of U.S. sanctions, hyperinflation (over 400% in 2023), and a staggering $60 billion debt, has been in freefall since South Sudan’s secession. The RSF’s control of Sudan’s gold mines—the country is Africa’s third-largest producer—has become a lifeline for the paramilitary group, enabling it to bypass state structures and fund its operations through illicit trade. Meanwhile, SAF-aligned elites compete for dwindling resources, including arable land and foreign currency reserves, intensifying the zero-sum struggle for power.
Ethnic and regional marginalization also underpins the conflict. In Darfur, non-Arab communities such as the Masalit have faced renewed attacks by RSF-aligned militias, echoing the genocide of the early 2000s. In 2023 alone, RSF assaults in El Geneina, West Darfur, killed thousands of Masalit civilians and displaced hundreds of thousands. Similar dynamics plague the Blue Nile and South Kordofan regions, where marginalized groups resist Khartoum’s exploitative policies. The RSF’s tactics—including ethnic cleansing, sexual violence, and recruitment of child soldiers—have deepened societal fractures, polarizing communities along ethnic lines.
Foreign interference has further internationalized the conflict. Regional powers such as the UAE and Saudi Arabia have provided financial and military support to the RSF, motivated by interests in Sudan’s gold reserves and a desire to counter Islamist influence. Egypt, meanwhile, backs the SAF to safeguard its strategic interests in the Nile River and counterbalance Emirati and Saudi sway. Russia’s Wagner Group has collaborated with the RSF to access gold mines, circumventing Western sanctions. Neighboring states like Chad and Ethiopia, already grappling with instability, face spillover effects, including refugee influxes and cross-border arms trafficking.
Humanitarian and Socioeconomic Impact
The human toll of the conflict is staggering. By late 2023, the United Nations reported over 9,000 fatalities, though actual figures are likely higher. More than 5.6 million people have been internally displaced, while 1.5 million have fled to neighboring countries, including Chad, South Sudan, and Egypt. Approximately 19 million Sudanese—40% of the population—face acute food insecurity, with 3.8 million children suffering from malnutrition. Famine-like conditions loom in regions cut off from aid, exacerbated by the deliberate targeting of humanitarian convoys and infrastructure.
Sudan’s urban centers have been decimated. Khartoum, the capital, has transformed into a war zone, with hospitals, schools, and water systems destroyed in relentless shelling. In Darfur, cities like El Fasher endure siege-like conditions, with medical supplies and food stocks depleted. Only 20% of Sudan’s health facilities remain functional, compounding outbreaks of cholera, malaria, and vaccine-preventable diseases. The collapse of sanitation systems has left millions without access to clean water, heightening the risk of epidemics.
Economically, the conflict has accelerated Sudan’s freefall. The country’s GDP contracted by 12% in 2022, while the Sudanese pound lost 60% of its value, rendering basic goods unaffordable for most. Unemployment exceeds 35%, and the RSF’s monopolization of gold exports—worth an estimated $4 billion annually—has deprived the state of critical revenue. Agricultural production, a cornerstone of Sudan’s economy, has plummeted due to displacement and the militarization of farmland, worsening food shortages.
Socially, the conflict risks creating a “lost generation.” Over 19 million children are out of school, while thousands have been recruited as child soldiers by both factions. Gender-based violence has surged, with at least 500 reported cases of rape in 2023—a fraction of the actual toll, given pervasive underreporting. Ethnic cleansing campaigns in Darfur have irreparably torn communities apart, with survivors recounting massacres, arson, and systematic sexual violence aimed at displacing non-Arab populations.
Read Also: The Gen Z Factor in Global Politics: A New Era of Change
Global Consequences of the Sudan Conflict
The Sudan conflict has reverberated far beyond its borders, destabilizing regions and straining international systems. Neighboring countries bear the brunt of the refugee crisis. Chad, one of the world’s poorest nations, hosts over 600,000 Sudanese refugees, overwhelming its already scarce resources. South Sudan, struggling to recover from its own civil war, has received 200,000 returnees, exacerbating food insecurity and intercommunal violence. In the Sahel, the RSF’s illicit arms networks have reportedly supplied jihadist groups in Mali and Burkina Faso, amplifying regional insecurity.
The humanitarian response remains critically underfunded. UN appeals for Sudan have secured only 30% of the required $2.6 billion, forcing aid agencies to slash rations and services. Humanitarian workers face unprecedented risks, with 19 killed in targeted attacks in 2023. The SAF and RSF routinely block aid access, using starvation as a weapon of war.
Geopolitically, the conflict reflects broader proxy rivalries. The UAE and Saudi Arabia’s backing of the RSF counters Egypt’s support for the SAF, mirroring Middle Eastern power struggles. Russia’s involvement, through Wagner’s gold-for-arms deals with the RSF, undermines Western sanctions and fuels Kremlin-aligned influence in Africa. These competing interests have paralyzed diplomatic efforts, with multiple ceasefire agreements collapsing within hours.
Global markets are also feeling the strain. Sudan produces 70% of the world’s gum arabic, a key ingredient in food and pharmaceuticals. Disruptions to its supply chain threaten industries worldwide, with potential price hikes for products ranging from soft drinks to vaccines. Meanwhile, the RSF’s illicit gold trade distorts global markets, flooding Dubai-based refineries with conflict minerals that evade international oversight.
Migration pressures linked to the crisis are reshaping regional dynamics. Refugees fleeing to Europe via Libya have intensified Mediterranean migration routes, fueling anti-immigrant sentiment and right-wing populism in Europe. This exodus underscores the interconnectedness of regional instability and global political trends.
The Sudan conflict is a tragic confluence of historical grievances, economic predation, and geopolitical opportunism. Without urgent international intervention—including enforceable arms embargoes, sustained humanitarian aid, and inclusive peace talks—the crisis will spiral into further fragmentation, with catastrophic consequences for Sudan and the world. Addressing root causes, such as systemic governance failures, ethnic marginalization, and foreign interference, is essential to breaking the cycle of violence. The international community must prioritize Sudan not merely as a humanitarian emergency but as a pivotal test of global commitment to peace and justice. Failure to act risks consigning millions to perpetual suffering and destabilizing an already volatile region. The time to act is now.
